Okay, I’m laying it out here. The next time I see a magazine photo with a “WORST BODY” caption slapped on a celebrity butt that looks exactly like mine, I’m going postal. Seriously, folks. I’m not running a marathon anytime soon, but an inadvertent glimpse of my glutes has never landed anyone in therapy, either.
It makes me crazy that I think like this. And it makes me even crazier that a female-targeted magazine – ostensibly for women, by women – MADE me think like this. (I didn’t even read the damned thing. I saw the cover at a supermarket.)
I’m not alone, though. It’s been empirically proven that perusing Cosmo, Glamour, Marie Claire, and celebrity-themed tabloids has a direct, negative impact on our self-regard. We think we’re catching up with Anne Hathaway, but really, we’re evaluating ourselves, consciously and otherwise, against the models. We look, we compare, and we envy. What's more, as a demographic, we pay billions of dollars in clothing, food, fitness, cosmetics, and surgery to emulate the famous, perfectly proportioned people we see on page 344 of Elle.
But here's the thing: women-oriented magazines can't hurt you if you have a realistic understanding of the insanity they promote.
So, in honor of the New Year, here’s a reality check; a few things to keep in mind next time US Weekly demands you go on a shopping spree. Or makes you doubt your appearance. Or causes you to curse Janet Jackson’s rack. (Which, by the way, was paid for.)
1. Cover models and actresses are paid to be thin and stylish. It’s in the job description, and in many cases, it IS the job description. Subsequently, these women spend a sizeable percentage of each day exercising, eating bird food, and reshaping their bodies for maximum profitability. While health and fitness are certainly important, the average American woman doesn’t have the time or money to dedicate five hours to them, daily.
2. Cover models and actresses can afford to be thin and fashionable. Jennifer Lopez has her own personal trainer. Designers trip over themselves to clothe Sarah Jessica Parker. Fully-prepared Zone meals are delivered to Jennifer Aniston everyday. Unlike the rest of us, these ladies have the thousands of dollars necessary to pay for door-to-door health services. And what they can’t buy? They can expect for free, since the publicity created by catering to a celebrity is invaluable.
3. Half of what you see is Photoshop. And it creates an unrealistic expectation of women’s bodies that’s dang near unethical. Check this picture of Faith Hill. And this one of Scarlett Johansson. And Beyonce. And Heidi Klum. And Jessica Alba. Then, check every single photo in the “Portfolio” section of this website (Eva Longoria, people!), or every single Vogue cover from 2008. These are gorgeous women, yet they’re tweaked so much, Barbie would blush. You know our beauty standards are out of whack when she has three inches electronically trimmed from her thighs.
(Oh, and one more thing: magazine staffs? Are just as unshaven, sleepy, and haggard as the rest of us come 5 o’clock on a Thursday. Case in point: this post from Photoshop Disasters.)
4. The other half is plastic surgery. That’s not Halle Berry’s original nose, Posh Spice paid dearly for those boobs, and (my beloved) Dolly Parton is nearly a cyborg (and dang proud of it). Even Marilyn Monroe was well-known to have had extensive facial work done. Though it’s promoted as a fix-all, the time, pain, and finances involved in cosmetic surgery aren’t realistic for us Jane Sixpacks. And half the time, who wants it anyway? Knives are scary.
5. Those models are six feet tall, 17-years-old, and wear a size 2. There are some things we can control about our bodies: what we eat, the frequency with which we move, and maybe the color of our hair. (My grays are persistent little buggers.) But our height, age, and bone structure aren’t among them. That Vogue pushes an 11th grade giantess as the accepted standard of beauty totally dismisses the 99.5% of the population existing outside those narrow parameters. In other words, look around, ladies. You’re not alone.
6. Magazine fad diets will make you miserable. Hear this: eating right and exercising is the only proven non-surgical way of dropping pounds for the long term. Detoxes, colonics, and Bill Romanowski’s Nutrition 53 shakes won’t do it, no matter what Life & Style says. All too often, there’s a massive disconnect between actual healthy eating and the “healthy eating” pushed in the glossies, which offer short term fixes when they should be looking at the big picture. This Marie Claire article does it right, and others should follow suit.
7. Body image articles are fall-backs to bump sales. Out of fresh ideas? No good gossip this week? Angelina and Brad have gone into hiding? Let’s slap up a collage of celebrity asses and grade ‘em! That’ll move copies, since we don’t have any actual advertisers this month!
Women's magazines aren't going away, and that's okay. On occasion, they're a welcome release from the grind. Still, it's important to regard them with a little bit of amused detachment. Essentially: don’t worry if you’re not the mirror image of Cameron Diaz. Odds are that image has been distorted anyway.
P.S. The easiest way to avoid this stuff? Don’t buy ladymags. It’s a glib suggestion, but it works.